| MSTH |
MSTH |
72%
|
Reciprocal relationship from MSTH graph: Reciprocal relationship from BLMH graph: rmal course of business to its customers. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and mainta… |
| MSTH |
MSTH |
72%
|
rmal course of business to its customers. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and maintains allowances for doubtful accounts based on factors surrounding the credit risk … |
| ADNANT-LLC |
ADNANT-LLC |
62%
|
r the nine months ended September 30, 2025 was $5.36 million, an increase of $0.27 million or 5.3% compared to $5.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2024. The increase in cost of goods… |
| BLUM-MANAGEMENT-HOLDINGS-INC |
BLUM-MANAGEMENT-HOLDINGS-INC |
62%
|
allowances for credit losses based on factors surrounding the credit risk of specific customers, historical trends, and other information. There were no customers that comprised more than 10.0% of th… |
| CALIFORNIA-LLC |
CALIFORNIA-LLC |
62%
|
tion for service conditions associated with share-based consideration payable to a customer, and clarifies that the guidance in ASC 606 on the variable consideration constraint does not apply to shar… |
| COASTAL-PINE-GROUP |
COASTAL-PINE-GROUP |
62%
|
. The term of the Agreement is indefinite and may only be terminated by the Company. The Agreement includes an option by Blum Management to purchase all of the outstanding equity of Coastal in exchan… |
| COASTAL-PINES-GROUP |
COASTAL-PINES-GROUP |
62%
|
2025: (in thousands) Three Months Ended September 30, June 30, 2025 2025 $ Change % Change Revenue $ 4,847 $ 3,478 $ 1,369 39.4 % Cost of Goods Sold 2,525 1,789 736 41.1 % Gross Profit 2,322 1,689 63… |
| EWC-RESOURCES-INC |
EWC-RESOURCES-INC |
62%
|
. The term of the Agreement is indefinite and may only be terminated by the Company. The Agreement includes an option by Blum Management to purchase all of the outstanding equity of Coastal in exchan… |
| GREEN-DOOR-REDDING-LLC |
GREEN-DOOR-REDDING-LLC |
62%
|
. The term of the Agreement is indefinite and may only be terminated by the Company. The Agreement includes an option by Blum Management to purchase all of the outstanding equity of Coastal in exchan… |
| HALLADAY-HOLDING-LLC |
HALLADAY-HOLDING-LLC |
62%
|
tion for service conditions associated with share-based consideration payable to a customer, and clarifies that the guidance in ASC 606 on the variable consideration constraint does not apply to shar… |
| MESH-VENTURES-LLC |
MESH-VENTURES-LLC |
62%
|
y • Cannabis Distribution – Includes cannabis distribution operations Either independently or in conjunction with third parties, we operate medical marijuana retail and adult use dispensaries in Cali… |
| MT-TAM-VENTURES-II-LLC |
MT-TAM-VENTURES-II-LLC |
62%
|
y • Cannabis Distribution – Includes cannabis distribution operations Either independently or in conjunction with third parties, we operate medical marijuana retail and adult use dispensaries in Cali… |
| MYSTIC-HOLDINGS-LLC |
MYSTIC-HOLDINGS-LLC |
62%
|
ore the Bankruptcy Court on the issue of whether Unrivaled should be allowed to abandon its equity shares in Mystic Holdings, LLC, which a hearing on this matter has been continued to December 3, 202… |
| OTC-MARKETS-GROUP-INC |
OTC-MARKETS-GROUP-INC |
62%
|
y • Cannabis Distribution – Includes cannabis distribution operations Either independently or in conjunction with third parties, we operate medical marijuana retail and adult use dispensaries in Cali… |
| PEOPLE-S-CALIFORNIA-LLC |
PEOPLE-S-CALIFORNIA-LLC |
62%
|
y • Cannabis Distribution – Includes cannabis distribution operations Either independently or in conjunction with third parties, we operate medical marijuana retail and adult use dispensaries in Cali… |
| PEOPLE-S-FIRST-CHOICE-LLC |
PEOPLE-S-FIRST-CHOICE-LLC |
62%
|
r the nine months ended September 30, 2025 was $5.36 million, an increase of $0.27 million or 5.3% compared to $5.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2024. The increase in cost of goods… |
| UNRIVALED-BRANDS-INC |
UNRIVALED-BRANDS-INC |
62%
|
tion for service conditions associated with share-based consideration payable to a customer, and clarifies that the guidance in ASC 606 on the variable consideration constraint does not apply to shar… |
