| BEST-BUY-CO-INC |
BEST-BUY-CO-INC |
90%
|
Best Buy Co., Inc. Best Buy (15), Pacific Sales (1) 16 633 11,447 1.9 % |
| MICHAELS-STORES-INC |
MICHAELS-STORES-INC |
90%
|
Michaels Stores, Inc. Michaels 28 631 8,346 1.4 % |
| ROSS-STORES-INC |
ROSS-STORES-INC |
90%
|
Ross Stores, Inc. Ross Dress for Less (32), dd’s DISCOUNTS (1) 33 937 11,333 1.9 % |
| BBY |
Best Buy Co., Inc. |
72%
|
nt KRG Remaining Spend Estimated Stabilized NOI to KRG Estimated Remaining NOI to Come Online (2) Active Projects The Corner – IN (3) Indianapolis, IN 50% Q1 2025 24,000 285 $31.9M $ — $ — $1.7M–$1.9… |
| BBY |
Best Buy Co., Inc. |
72%
|
Reciprocal relationship from BBY graph: Reciprocal relationship from KRG graph: nt KRG Remaining Spend Estimated Stabilized NOI to KRG Estimated Remaining NOI to Come Online (2) Active Projects The C… |
| BURL |
Burlington Stores, Inc. |
72%
|
nt KRG Remaining Spend Estimated Stabilized NOI to KRG Estimated Remaining NOI to Come Online (2) Active Projects The Corner – IN (3) Indianapolis, IN 50% Q1 2025 24,000 285 $31.9M $ — $ — $1.7M–$1.9… |
| BURL |
Burlington Stores, Inc. |
72%
|
Reciprocal relationship from BURL graph: Reciprocal relationship from KRG graph: nt KRG Remaining Spend Estimated Stabilized NOI to KRG Estimated Remaining NOI to Come Online (2) Active Projects The … |
| DBI |
Designer Brands Inc. |
72%
|
Reciprocal relationship from DBI graph: Reciprocal relationship from KRG graph: nt KRG Remaining Spend Estimated Stabilized NOI to KRG Estimated Remaining NOI to Come Online (2) Active Projects The C… |
| DBI |
Designer Brands Inc. |
72%
|
nt KRG Remaining Spend Estimated Stabilized NOI to KRG Estimated Remaining NOI to Come Online (2) Active Projects The Corner – IN (3) Indianapolis, IN 50% Q1 2025 24,000 285 $31.9M $ — $ — $1.7M–$1.9… |
| ROST |
Ross Stores, Inc. |
72%
|
nt KRG Remaining Spend Estimated Stabilized NOI to KRG Estimated Remaining NOI to Come Online (2) Active Projects The Corner – IN (3) Indianapolis, IN 50% Q1 2025 24,000 285 $31.9M $ — $ — $1.7M–$1.9… |
| ROST |
Ross Stores, Inc. |
72%
|
Reciprocal relationship from ROST graph: Reciprocal relationship from KRG graph: nt KRG Remaining Spend Estimated Stabilized NOI to KRG Estimated Remaining NOI to Come Online (2) Active Projects The … |
| SFM |
Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. |
72%
|
Reciprocal relationship from SFM graph: Reciprocal relationship from KRG graph: nt KRG Remaining Spend Estimated Stabilized NOI to KRG Estimated Remaining NOI to Come Online (2) Active Projects The C… |
| SFM |
Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. |
72%
|
nt KRG Remaining Spend Estimated Stabilized NOI to KRG Estimated Remaining NOI to Come Online (2) Active Projects The Corner – IN (3) Indianapolis, IN 50% Q1 2025 24,000 285 $31.9M $ — $ — $1.7M–$1.9… |
| TJX |
The TJX Companies, Inc. |
72%
|
nt KRG Remaining Spend Estimated Stabilized NOI to KRG Estimated Remaining NOI to Come Online (2) Active Projects The Corner – IN (3) Indianapolis, IN 50% Q1 2025 24,000 285 $31.9M $ — $ — $1.7M–$1.9… |
| TJX |
The TJX Companies, Inc. |
72%
|
Reciprocal relationship from TJX graph: Reciprocal relationship from KRG graph: Reciprocal relationship from TJX graph: Reciprocal relationship from KRG graph: Reciprocal relationship from TJX graph:… |
| ULTA |
Ulta Beauty, Inc. |
72%
|
nt KRG Remaining Spend Estimated Stabilized NOI to KRG Estimated Remaining NOI to Come Online (2) Active Projects The Corner – IN (3) Indianapolis, IN 50% Q1 2025 24,000 285 $31.9M $ — $ — $1.7M–$1.9… |
| ULTA |
Ulta Beauty, Inc. |
72%
|
Reciprocal relationship from ULTA graph: Reciprocal relationship from KRG graph: nt KRG Remaining Spend Estimated Stabilized NOI to KRG Estimated Remaining NOI to Come Online (2) Active Projects The … |
| WOOF |
Petco Health and Wellness Company, Inc. |
72%
|
nt KRG Remaining Spend Estimated Stabilized NOI to KRG Estimated Remaining NOI to Come Online (2) Active Projects The Corner – IN (3) Indianapolis, IN 50% Q1 2025 24,000 285 $31.9M $ — $ — $1.7M–$1.9… |
| WOOF |
Petco Health and Wellness Company, Inc. |
72%
|
Reciprocal relationship from WOOF graph: Reciprocal relationship from KRG graph: nt KRG Remaining Spend Estimated Stabilized NOI to KRG Estimated Remaining NOI to Come Online (2) Active Projects The … |
| CASUALTY-LLC |
CASUALTY-LLC |
62%
|
Strategy. Our primary operating strategy is to maximize our rental rates, returns on invested capital, and occupancy levels by attracting and retaining a strong and diverse tenant base. Most of our p… |
| INLAND-DIVERSIFIED-REAL-ESTATE-TRUST-INC |
INLAND-DIVERSIFIED-REAL-ESTATE-TRUST-INC |
62%
|
in the amount specified above or a number of its common shares equal to the number of Limited Partner Units being redeemed. There were 4,192,597 and 3,512,868 Limited Partner Units outstanding as of … |
| IWR-PROTECTIVE-CORPORATION |
IWR-PROTECTIVE-CORPORATION |
62%
|
e AI tools (“AI”), presents risks and challenges that could adversely affect our business. We are evaluating AI solutions to assist our employees with research, content generation, and decision suppo… |
| OPERATING-PARTNERSHIP-KITE-REALTY-GROUP |
OPERATING-PARTNERSHIP-KITE-REALTY-GROUP |
62%
|
e AI tools (“AI”), presents risks and challenges that could adversely affect our business. We are evaluating AI solutions to assist our employees with research, content generation, and decision suppo… |
| OVERVIEW-KITE-REALTY-GROUP |
OVERVIEW-KITE-REALTY-GROUP |
62%
|
s of, our indebtedness; • the level and volatility of interest rates; • the financial stability of our tenants; • the competitive environment in which we operate, including potential oversupplies of,… |
| REIT-COMPLIANCE-PARENT-COMPANY-THE-PARENT-COMPAN |
REIT-COMPLIANCE-PARENT-COMPANY-THE-PARENT-COMPAN |
62%
|
ract and Level 3 inputs include our estimation of capitalization rates. Note 8. “Mortgage and Other Indebtedness” to the accompanying consolidated financial statements includes a discussion of the es… |
| SECURITIES-INVESTOR-PROTECTION-CORPORATION |
SECURITIES-INVESTOR-PROTECTION-CORPORATION |
62%
|
ership, we consider all relationships between the Operating Partnership and the applicable VIE, including development and management agreements and other contractual arrangements, in determining whet… |
